I have been reading Heim & Kratzer's Semantics in Generative Grammar, which is an excellent introduction to formal semantics. On the whole, I've really liked the book, until I got to an example sentence in the 8th chapter:
(1) Every man placed a screen in front of him.
The authors claimed that this sentence was synonymous with
(2) Every man placed a screen in front of himself.
I though this was absurd, because to me the first sentence must mean that there is some man (let's call him 'Jim,') and all the other men put a screen in front of Jim. It just can't have the meaning of (2). I have a great deal of respect for the authors, but my immediate reaction was that this must be one of those cases in which linguists unconciously adapt their judgments to their theory (it was important for the theory Heim & Kratzer were developing that (1) mean the same as (2)).
Just to be sure, I walked into the office down the hall and took a poll of the seven people in it, none of whom study pronouns or are particularly familiar with the literature. Two of them agreed with me, but five agreed with Heim & Kratzer. So this may be a dialectical difference.
Now I feel bad about having doubted H&K, but in any case it is a good lesson about studying language: don't trust your own intuitions. Get a second opinion.
- Home
- Angry by Choice
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Chinleana
- Doc Madhattan
- Games with Words
- Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
- History of Geology
- Moss Plants and More
- Pleiotropy
- Plektix
- RRResearch
- Skeptic Wonder
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Phytophactor
- The View from a Microbiologist
- Variety of Life
Field of Science
-
-
Change of address6 months ago in Variety of Life
-
Change of address6 months ago in Catalogue of Organisms
-
-
Earth Day: Pogo and our responsibility9 months ago in Doc Madhattan
-
What I Read 20249 months ago in Angry by Choice
-
I've moved to Substack. Come join me there.11 months ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
-
-
Histological Evidence of Trauma in Dicynodont Tusks7 years ago in Chinleana
-
Posted: July 21, 2018 at 03:03PM7 years ago in Field Notes
-
Why doesn't all the GTA get taken up?7 years ago in RRResearch
-
-
Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV9 years ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
-
post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry!10 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens11 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Re-Blog: June Was 6th Warmest Globally11 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl13 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Lab Rat Moving House14 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs14 years ago in Disease Prone
-
-
Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby14 years ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
in The Biology Files
2 comments:
I would also read the "him" as being the same person referenced earlier in the sentence, unless the context lead me in the other direction.
I'm curious about your statement "It just can't have the meaning of (2)."
Did you mean "It just can't mean..." or "It can't just mean...".
(The first meaning that it's impossible, the second meaning that it isn't exclusive.)
I meant that (2) is impossible.
Post a Comment